Course and roster data duplicated across systems
01Enrollments are maintained in the SIS, LMS and third-party tools separately, so students end up in the wrong section or lose access.
EDUCATION SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENTMake learning and administrative data work across the academic journey.
We build learning platforms, assessment tools and administrative systems that plug into your LMS and SIS through standards like LTI and OneRoster, with student privacy, accessibility and educator control designed in.
EdTech founders, K-12 districts, colleges, training organizations and education administrators
THE OPERATIONAL GAP
Learning data needs more than another portal.
Schools and EdTech products struggle most where rosters, grades and access move between systems.
Assessment feedback without a clear trail
02Grades and comments are spread across tools, making it hard to show how a grade was reached or to handle appeals.
Inconsistent updates for students and guardians
03Families receive messages from several systems with conflicting information about grades, attendance and deadlines.
Reporting that depends on manual exports
04Administrators export and merge spreadsheets for every progress, compliance or funding report.
Course and roster data duplicated across systems
01Enrollments are maintained in the SIS, LMS and third-party tools separately, so students end up in the wrong section or lose access.
Assessment feedback without a clear trail
02Grades and comments are spread across tools, making it hard to show how a grade was reached or to handle appeals.
Inconsistent updates for students and guardians
03Families receive messages from several systems with conflicting information about grades, attendance and deadlines.
Reporting that depends on manual exports
04Administrators export and merge spreadsheets for every progress, compliance or funding report.
WHAT WE BUILD
Education software we design and build.
We build tools that fit into existing school ecosystems rather than adding another disconnected login.
01
Learning management and course portals
Course delivery, content and progress tracking, either standalone or extending your LMS through LTI.
02
Student information and administration systems
Enrollment, scheduling, attendance and records workflows integrated with your SIS.
03
Assessment and feedback applications
Assignment, rubric, grading and feedback tools with grade passback and moderation trails.
04
Training and enrollment SaaS platforms
Multi-organization platforms for course catalogs, registration, payments and certificates.
01
Learning management and course portals
Course delivery, content and progress tracking, either standalone or extending your LMS through LTI.
02
Student information and administration systems
Enrollment, scheduling, attendance and records workflows integrated with your SIS.
03
Assessment and feedback applications
Assignment, rubric, grading and feedback tools with grade passback and moderation trails.
04
Training and enrollment SaaS platforms
Multi-organization platforms for course catalogs, registration, payments and certificates.
WORKFLOW EXAMPLE
From enrollment to recorded progress.
An example learning flow. Roles, grading rules and reporting access are set with your academic team.
Learner enrolled in program
InputSIS enrollment or self-registration
OutputEnrollment record with program, section and term
01Role and course access assigned
InputEnrollment record and roster sync
OutputLMS access with correct role, section and accommodations
02Materials and assessments delivered
InputCourse content and assessment schedule
OutputSubmitted work with timestamps and accessibility settings applied
03Feedback and grades reviewed by educator
InputSubmissions, rubric scores and any AI-suggested feedback
OutputEducator-approved grade and feedback with audit trail
Review required
04Progress recorded and reported
InputApproved grades
OutputGrade passback to SIS, learner dashboards and authorized reports
05
SYSTEM DESIGN
The architecture behind the workflow.
A reference design built on education interoperability standards where your vendors support them.
- SIS and enrollment data
- Roster and identity integration
- LMS or learning application
- Assessment and grading workflow
- Learner, educator and admin dashboards
- Feedback and grades reviewed by educator
- SIS and enrollment data to Roster and identity integration
- Roster and identity integration to LMS or learning application
- LMS or learning application to Assessment and grading workflow
- Assessment and grading workflow to Learner, educator and admin dashboards
- Assessment and grading workflow to Feedback and grades reviewed by educator
- Feedback and grades reviewed by educator to Learner, educator and admin dashboards
SIS and enrollment data -> Roster and identity integration -> LMS or learning application -> Assessment and grading workflow -> Learner, educator and admin dashboards
01
SIS and enrollment data
Supplies students, sections, enrollments and terms as the record of truth.
02
Roster and identity integration
Syncs rosters via OneRoster or vendor APIs and provides single sign-on through your identity provider.
03
LMS or learning application
Delivers content and activities, launched through LTI 1.3 where it extends an existing LMS.
04
Assessment and grading workflow
Manages submissions, rubrics, educator review and grade passback.
05
Learner, educator and admin dashboards
Show progress and reports scoped to each user's role and relationship to the student.
Technology
Chosen for the systems above.
These tools are already in published projects with a similar shape of work. The set for your release is confirmed once the interfaces and review points are known.
- 1EdTech LTI 1.3
- OneRoster
- SAML / OpenID Connect SSO
- Canvas / Moodle / Google Classroom APIs
- WCAG 2.2 testing tools
Frontend
Next.jsBootstrapNext.jsBootstrapBackend
Node.jsExpress.jsNode.jsExpress.jsRelational Database
MySQLMySQLDocument Database
MongoDBMongoDBAI Integration
OpenAIOpenAINoSQL Database
MongoDBMongoDBArtificial Intelligence
OpenAIOpenAIAnimations
Framer MotionFramer MotionDatabase
PostgreSQLPostgreSQL
DESIGN TRADE-OFFS
Decisions that change cost, reliability and scope.
Standards support and student privacy obligations drive most of these decisions.
LTI and OneRoster versus custom APIs
Standards make integration repeatable across schools, but vendor support and versions vary. Custom APIs may be needed for specific SIS platforms.
Check each target LMS and SIS for LTI 1.3 and OneRoster certification.
AI tutoring and feedback versus AI grading
AI can support practice, hints and draft feedback. Grades that affect progression or credentials should stay under educator control.
Evaluate AI output on real, de-identified student work with educators.
Single institution versus multi-institution tenancy
Serving many schools requires strict data separation, per-district settings and data-processing agreements for each customer.
Map privacy agreements and data residency needs per customer type.
LTI and OneRoster versus custom APIs
Standards make integration repeatable across schools, but vendor support and versions vary. Custom APIs may be needed for specific SIS platforms.
Check each target LMS and SIS for LTI 1.3 and OneRoster certification.
AI tutoring and feedback versus AI grading
AI can support practice, hints and draft feedback. Grades that affect progression or credentials should stay under educator control.
Evaluate AI output on real, de-identified student work with educators.
Single institution versus multi-institution tenancy
Serving many schools requires strict data separation, per-district settings and data-processing agreements for each customer.
Map privacy agreements and data residency needs per customer type.
SECURITY & COMPLIANCE
Controls appropriate to student data.
We design for FERPA, COPPA and state student-privacy requirements as they apply to your product and customers.
FERPA applies to education records held by institutions receiving federal funds and to vendors acting on their behalf; COPPA applies to online services collecting data from children under 13. Many states add student-privacy laws and data-privacy agreements.
Student privacy and age-appropriate safeguards
Student data is used only for the contracted educational purpose, minimized and protected with additional safeguards for children under 13.
Educator, learner and guardian permissions
Access reflects each user's role and relationship, such as teacher of record or verified guardian.
Accessible learning experiences
Interfaces and content are built and tested against WCAG 2.2 AA, including keyboard, screen reader and caption support.
Assessment audit trails and educator oversight
Grade changes, AI-assisted suggestions and overrides are logged with who made them and why.
WCAG 2.2 AA1EdTech LTI 1.3 and OneRosterNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0
WCAG 2.2 AA1EdTech LTI 1.3 and OneRosterNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0
DELIVERY APPROACH
From real academic constraints to a verifiable release.
We plan around the academic calendar so launches don't land mid-term.
01
Identify learner roles and curriculum data
Map users, courses, programs and the data each role needs.
Signed role and data inventory, including privacy agreements in force.
02
Define roster and grade mappings
Map SIS and LMS fields for sections, enrollments and grades.
Approved mappings and sync rules for adds, drops and section changes.
03
Build one complete learning journey
Deliver enrollment to graded progress for one course or program.
Working journey tested with educators and test students.
04
Test accessibility and grading exceptions
Run accessibility audits and test late work, regrades and roster changes.
Accessibility audit results and grading exception tests passed.
05
Launch with educator support and monitoring
Release before a term starts with training and sync monitoring.
Launch plan aligned to the academic calendar, training and support owners signed off.
Published work
Projects you can read in full.
Each card is a published project. The industry on the card is the one that work was built for.
EdTech / Student Management
Campus Flow
The client needed one system to manage student activities without using separate tools or manual records.
Read the project
EdTech / Education Administration
OpsPilot — AI-Powered Admin Portal
The institute faced the following challenges in managing its daily operations.
Read the project
EdTech and Language Education
Speakify – Global Language Center
While understanding the platform needs, we found the following problems faced by learners, instructors, and the institution:
Read the project
From the journal
Reading that sits beside this work.
Recent notes from the team. Pieces that match this industry are shown first.
Case Studies
AI Integration Case Study: How We Connected OpenAI to an Enterprise Platform Managing 6,400+ Student Records
AI Integration & Automation
AI Integration for Businesses: The Complete Guide to Planning, Implementation, Costs and ROI
AI SaaS & Product Development
AI SaaS Development Cost: From MVP to Scale in 2026
PROJECT PLANNING
What we need to define before development begins.
These questions shape integration, privacy and launch timing.
- 01
Which LMS, SIS and identity provider do you or your customers use?
- 02
Are users children under 13, K-12 students, adult learners or a mix?
- 03
Which grades or credentials does the product affect, and who approves them?
- 04
Which state privacy agreements or district requirements apply?
- 05
When does the next term start, and what must be ready by then?
LMS and SIS sandbox access
Student data privacy agreements
Educator reviewers
Academic calendar and launch window
LMS and SIS sandbox access
Student data privacy agreements
Educator reviewers
Academic calendar and launch window
Education software development FAQs.
Yes, typically through LTI 1.3 for launch and grade passback, and OneRoster or vendor APIs for rosters. We confirm which standards and versions each platform supports in your environment.
AI can suggest rubric scores and draft feedback to save educator time, but educators should review and approve grades that affect progression or credentials. We test suggestions against educator grading before use.
We minimize what is collected, restrict access by role and relationship, encrypt data, log access and support data-deletion requests, and build to the requirements of FERPA, COPPA and applicable state laws and agreements.
Yes. Multi-institution platforms need tenant separation, per-customer settings and roster sync, and privacy agreements with each customer. We design for that from the start.
We design and test against WCAG 2.2 AA, including keyboard navigation, screen readers, captions and color contrast, and document results so you can respond to accessibility reviews.
The institution owns the student data. The learning system and identity provider remain under the school's agreements. We document what is copied into the new platform and how a student or staff account is removed.
Yes. A product used by more than one school or district is built so one tenant cannot read another's students, grades, or files.
One course flow or one admin task, connected to the system that already holds the roster. Grading that changes an official record waits until a faculty owner has defined what the software is allowed to do.
Yes, when the school can provide SSO. We use that directory for staff and, where it exists, for students, instead of creating a second password for every user.
Building a learning platform or school system?
Tell us who your learners are and which systems you connect to. We'll scope a first release ready before your next term.
Tell us how the work runs today, which systems already hold the data, and what a useful first release would change. We use that to judge scope before anyone writes a proposal.
The form goes to a solutions architect at THE TISA. You get a direct reply on fit, approach, and what we would need from your team.
Share your scope
Tell us about the workflow or product. A solutions architect replies within one business day.