LOGISTICS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENTTurn shipment events into operational decisions.

We build shipment visibility, carrier integration and exception management software that pulls events from TMS, carriers and warehouses into one timeline, so your team acts on delays before customers call.

Freight operators, 3PLs, distributors and supply-chain technology teams

See How We Scope Projects
CampusFlow software development case study — THE TISAEZSKU software development case study — THE TISAGroup Hotel Index software development case study — THE TISALockYantra software development case study — THE TISANarsik Logistics software development case study — THE TISAOpsPilot software development case study — THE TISARatiwal software development case study — THE TISASpeakify software development case study — THE TISA
CampusFlow software development case study — THE TISAEZSKU software development case study — THE TISAGroup Hotel Index software development case study — THE TISALockYantra software development case study — THE TISANarsik Logistics software development case study — THE TISAOpsPilot software development case study — THE TISARatiwal software development case study — THE TISASpeakify software development case study — THE TISA
Dispatcher monitoring shipment exceptions on a multi-screen workstation — THE TISA

THE OPERATIONAL GAP

The expensive gap between shipment status and action.

Most logistics projects fail at integration, not features. These are the breakdowns we look for first.

Shipment status scattered across carrier portals

01

Teams log into multiple carrier sites and email for updates, so nobody has a complete, current picture of loads in transit.

Exceptions surface after commitments are missed

02

Delays and missed pickups are discovered when a customer calls, leaving no time to re-route, re-book or warn them.

Proof-of-delivery paperwork reconciled by hand

03

PODs, BOLs and accessorial documents arrive as photos and PDFs and must be matched to loads before invoicing, delaying cash.

Partners use incompatible reference numbers

04

PO, BOL, PRO and container numbers differ by partner, so events can't be reliably attached to the right shipment.

Shipment status scattered across carrier portals

01

Teams log into multiple carrier sites and email for updates, so nobody has a complete, current picture of loads in transit.

Exceptions surface after commitments are missed

02

Delays and missed pickups are discovered when a customer calls, leaving no time to re-route, re-book or warn them.

Proof-of-delivery paperwork reconciled by hand

03

PODs, BOLs and accessorial documents arrive as photos and PDFs and must be matched to loads before invoicing, delaying cash.

Partners use incompatible reference numbers

04

PO, BOL, PRO and container numbers differ by partner, so events can't be reliably attached to the right shipment.

WHAT WE BUILD

Logistics software we design and build.

We connect the systems you already rely on and build the visibility and exception layer above them.

01

Shipment visibility platforms

A single timeline per shipment combining TMS, carrier, telematics and warehouse events, with customer-facing tracking.

02

Transportation workflow systems

Load building, tendering, carrier assignment and appointment scheduling that complement or extend your TMS.

03

Carrier and warehouse integrations

API, EDI and file integrations with carriers, 3PLs and WMS platforms, with monitoring for missing or late messages.

04

Exception and proof-of-delivery portals

Exception queues with owners and SLAs, plus POD capture and document matching that speeds up billing.

01

Shipment visibility platforms

A single timeline per shipment combining TMS, carrier, telematics and warehouse events, with customer-facing tracking.

02

Transportation workflow systems

Load building, tendering, carrier assignment and appointment scheduling that complement or extend your TMS.

03

Carrier and warehouse integrations

API, EDI and file integrations with carriers, 3PLs and WMS platforms, with monitoring for missing or late messages.

04

Exception and proof-of-delivery portals

Exception queues with owners and SLAs, plus POD capture and document matching that speeds up billing.

WORKFLOW EXAMPLE

From confirmed order to resolved exception.

An example shipment flow. Milestones, SLAs and escalation rules are set with your operations team.

  1. Load created from confirmed order

    InputConfirmed customer order from ERP or OMS

    OutputLoad with stops, references, appointment windows and service level

    01
  2. Carrier accepts tender

    InputLoad tender via API, EDI 204 or portal

    OutputAccepted assignment with carrier references stored

    02
  3. Location and status events received

    InputCarrier API, EDI 214, ELD or telematics updates

    OutputNormalized milestones attached to the right shipment

    03
  4. Exception or missed milestone detected

    InputMilestones compared with plan and SLAs

    OutputException with severity, owner and suggested action

    Review required

    04
  5. Owner notified and resolution captured

    InputAssigned exception

    OutputCustomer update, recorded resolution and accessorial or claim data

    05

SYSTEM DESIGN

The architecture behind the workflow.

A reference design built around a normalized event history, so every partner's data means the same thing.

  1. ERP and order service
  2. TMS, carrier and EDI connectors
  3. Normalized milestone event store
  4. Rules, SLA and ETA computation
  5. Customer and dispatch dashboards
  6. Exception or missed milestone detected
  7. ERP and order service to TMS, carrier and EDI connectors
  8. TMS, carrier and EDI connectors to Normalized milestone event store
  9. Normalized milestone event store to Rules, SLA and ETA computation
  10. Rules, SLA and ETA computation to Customer and dispatch dashboards
  11. Rules, SLA and ETA computation to Exception or missed milestone detected
  12. Exception or missed milestone detected to Customer and dispatch dashboards

ERP and order service -> TMS, carrier and EDI connectors -> Normalized milestone event store -> Rules, SLA and ETA computation -> Customer and dispatch dashboards

  • 01

    ERP and order service

    Supplies confirmed orders, customer references and service commitments.

  • 02

    TMS, carrier and EDI connectors

    Exchange tenders and status messages over APIs, EDI (204, 990, 214, 210) or files, with monitoring for missing messages.

  • 03

    Normalized milestone event store

    Stores every event with source, time and reference mapping, de-duplicated and replayable.

  • 04

    Rules, SLA and ETA computation

    Compares actual milestones against plan, calculates estimated arrival and raises exceptions.

  • 05

    Customer and dispatch dashboards

    Gives dispatchers exception queues and customers scoped tracking views.

Technology

Chosen for the systems above.

These tools are already in published projects with a similar shape of work. The set for your release is confirmed once the interfaces and review points are known.

  • EDI X12 (204, 214, 210, 990)
  • Carrier and telematics APIs
  • Event streaming
  • Geolocation services
  • Mobile POD capture
  • Frontend

    Next.js
    Next.js
  • Styling

    Tailwind CSS
    Tailwind CSS
  • Database

    PostgreSQL
    MySQL
    PostgreSQL
    MySQL
  • Programming Language

    TypeScript
    TypeScript
  • Backend

    NestJS
    Node.js
    Express.js
    NestJS
    Node.js
    Express.js
  • Mobile Application

    React Native
    React Native

DESIGN TRADE-OFFS

Decisions that change cost, reliability and scope.

Partner capability, not preference, drives most integration choices in logistics.

Carrier APIs versus EDI versus polling

Large carriers offer APIs or EDI; smaller ones may only support portals or email. Supporting the right mix determines coverage and maintenance cost.

Survey your carrier base by volume and supported interfaces.

Predicted ETA versus scheduled milestones

Predicted arrival times need clean historical event data; without it, schedule-based estimates are more honest. Both should be clearly labeled as estimates.

Back-test ETA logic on at least several months of your shipment history.

Eventual consistency versus immediate confirmation

Partner events arrive late and out of order. Status definitions must say what 'delivered' means and which source wins when they disagree.

Document status semantics and source precedence with operations.

Carrier APIs versus EDI versus polling

Large carriers offer APIs or EDI; smaller ones may only support portals or email. Supporting the right mix determines coverage and maintenance cost.

Survey your carrier base by volume and supported interfaces.

Predicted ETA versus scheduled milestones

Predicted arrival times need clean historical event data; without it, schedule-based estimates are more honest. Both should be clearly labeled as estimates.

Back-test ETA logic on at least several months of your shipment history.

Eventual consistency versus immediate confirmation

Partner events arrive late and out of order. Status definitions must say what 'delivered' means and which source wins when they disagree.

Document status semantics and source precedence with operations.

SECURITY & COMPLIANCE

Controls appropriate to shared supply-chain data.

Logistics platforms share data across many companies, so access boundaries and message integrity matter.

ETA accuracy depends on the quality and timeliness of partner events; we evaluate accuracy on historical data rather than guarantee it.

  • Partner-scoped shipment visibility

    Customers, carriers and vendors see only the shipments and fields they are party to.

  • Signed webhooks and replay protection

    Inbound messages are authenticated and checked for duplicates and replays before they change shipment status.

  • Exception and change audit trails

    Every status override, exception resolution and charge is recorded with user, time and reason.

  • Document and delivery-evidence retention

    PODs, BOLs and photos are stored with integrity checks and retained according to your contract and claims requirements.

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0NIST AI Risk Management Framework
NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0NIST AI Risk Management Framework

DELIVERY APPROACH

From real partner constraints to a verifiable release.

We start with your highest-volume lane or carrier and expand as integrations prove reliable.

  1. 01

    Map shipment lifecycle and identifiers

    Document milestones, reference numbers and which partner sends what.

    Signed milestone and identifier map covering top carriers and customers.

  2. 02

    Connect one carrier and milestone feed

    Integrate the highest-volume carrier or TMS feed end to end.

    Live feed attaching events to shipments with match-rate reporting.

  3. 03

    Build exception ownership rules

    Define SLAs, severity and routing for each exception type.

    Exception queue working with owners, escalation and customer notification templates.

  4. 04

    Validate delayed, duplicate and missing events

    Replay historical data and simulate partner outages.

    Test results for out-of-order, duplicate and missing message handling.

  5. 05

    Expand partners with monitoring

    Onboard further carriers and 3PLs with feed-health monitoring.

    Partner onboarding checklist, feed monitoring and support ownership signed off.

PROJECT PLANNING

What we need to define before development begins.

Your carrier list and a sample of recent shipments are the best starting point.

  1. 01

    Which TMS, WMS and ERP systems are in use, and which owns shipment status?

  2. 02

    Which carriers and 3PLs handle most of your volume, and how do they send updates?

  3. 03

    Which reference numbers do partners use, and how are they linked today?

  4. 04

    Which exceptions cost you most: late delivery, detention, damage or billing disputes?

  5. 05

    What would make the first release a success, such as earlier exception detection or faster invoicing?

Carrier and 3PL API/EDI credentials

TMS and ERP access

Historical shipment and event data

Operations exception owners

Carrier and 3PL API/EDI credentials

TMS and ERP access

Historical shipment and event data

Operations exception owners

Logistics software development FAQs.

Yes. We support carrier APIs, EDI transactions such as 204, 214 and 210, telematics feeds and visibility providers, and normalize them into one shipment timeline. Carriers that only offer portals can be handled through visibility networks or structured manual updates.

We define expected milestones for each shipment, alert when one doesn't arrive in time, and fall back to secondary sources such as telematics or visibility providers. Late events are applied in the correct order without overwriting newer status.

Largely. Drivers capture PODs in a mobile app or carriers send them electronically; documents are matched to shipments by reference numbers and OCR, and only mismatches go to staff before invoicing.

We start from scheduled transit times and live location, then add historical lane performance where you have enough data. Predicted times are labeled as estimates and their accuracy is measured against actual arrivals.

Usually not. Most visibility and exception problems can be solved with integrations and a layer above your TMS, which is faster and less disruptive than replacement.

You own the application and the shipment records it stores. Carriers and warehouse systems remain under your accounts. We record which identifier is used when the same shipment appears in more than one system.

Yes. The first release usually sits in front of the systems they already use and takes one handoff, such as booking or exception handling, instead of replacing the TMS on day one.

One lane or one customer type, one set of status events, and a queue for the events that arrive late or not at all. Broader carrier coverage follows after that path is stable.

Carrier and warehouse credentials stay in a secrets store your team controls. They are not placed in the application code or in a shared document.

Have a shipment, carrier or exception workflow to fix?

Share your systems and carrier mix. We'll propose a first integration and the exceptions it would catch.

Tell us how the work runs today, which systems already hold the data, and what a useful first release would change. We use that to judge scope before anyone writes a proposal.

The form goes to a solutions architect at THE TISA. You get a direct reply on fit, approach, and what we would need from your team.

18+AI Agents
24+Workflow Automation
35+AI Integrations
12+SaaS Products
16+Generative AI
40+Mobile Apps
45+Web Platforms
25+Cloud Delivery
98%Client Retention

Share your scope

Tell us about the workflow or product. A solutions architect replies within one business day.

7 + 4 =