ENERGY & UTILITY SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENTConnect asset data, field work and service operations.

We build field inspection apps, maintenance workflows and customer service portals that use your GIS and asset registry, work offline in the field and stay separate from control systems.

Utilities, renewable energy operators, asset managers and field service teams

See How We Scope Projects
CampusFlow software development case study — THE TISAEZSKU software development case study — THE TISAGroup Hotel Index software development case study — THE TISALockYantra software development case study — THE TISANarsik Logistics software development case study — THE TISAOpsPilot software development case study — THE TISARatiwal software development case study — THE TISASpeakify software development case study — THE TISA
CampusFlow software development case study — THE TISAEZSKU software development case study — THE TISAGroup Hotel Index software development case study — THE TISALockYantra software development case study — THE TISANarsik Logistics software development case study — THE TISAOpsPilot software development case study — THE TISARatiwal software development case study — THE TISASpeakify software development case study — THE TISA
Field technician inspecting electrical equipment with a rugged tablet — THE TISA

THE OPERATIONAL GAP

Field decisions need reliable asset context.

Energy and utility teams depend on accurate asset records and timely field data. These are the gaps we look for first.

Asset registers out of step with field inspections

01

Inspection findings are recorded on paper or in separate apps, so the asset register and GIS don't reflect real conditions.

Work orders without current condition data

02

Crews are dispatched without recent inspection results, photos or history, leading to repeat visits.

Fragmented outage and service communication

03

Customers receive inconsistent outage and service updates across phone, web and text.

Metering and operational data hard to reconcile

04

Meter, billing and operational data use different identifiers and timing, complicating reporting and investigations.

Asset registers out of step with field inspections

01

Inspection findings are recorded on paper or in separate apps, so the asset register and GIS don't reflect real conditions.

Work orders without current condition data

02

Crews are dispatched without recent inspection results, photos or history, leading to repeat visits.

Fragmented outage and service communication

03

Customers receive inconsistent outage and service updates across phone, web and text.

Metering and operational data hard to reconcile

04

Meter, billing and operational data use different identifiers and timing, complicating reporting and investigations.

WHAT WE BUILD

Energy and utility software we design and build.

We work alongside your GIS, asset management, CIS and OT systems rather than replacing them.

01

Asset maintenance platforms

Preventive and corrective maintenance tied to the asset registry and condition history.

02

Field inspection and technician apps

Offline-capable mobile apps with map views, checklists, photos and GPS-stamped findings.

03

Energy operations dashboards

Asset health, work backlog and performance views drawn from business systems and read-only telemetry.

04

Customer request and service portals

Service requests, outage reporting and status updates connected to work management.

01

Asset maintenance platforms

Preventive and corrective maintenance tied to the asset registry and condition history.

02

Field inspection and technician apps

Offline-capable mobile apps with map views, checklists, photos and GPS-stamped findings.

03

Energy operations dashboards

Asset health, work backlog and performance views drawn from business systems and read-only telemetry.

04

Customer request and service portals

Service requests, outage reporting and status updates connected to work management.

WORKFLOW EXAMPLE

From asset alert to updated asset history.

An example field workflow. Priority rules, crew qualifications and approval steps are set with your operations team.

  1. Asset alert or inspection submitted

    InputTelemetry threshold, inspection finding or customer report

    OutputIssue record with source, location and evidence

    01
  2. Equipment and location matched

    InputIssue record and GIS/asset registry

    OutputIssue linked to the correct asset, circuit or site

    02
  3. Priority evaluated against rules

    InputAsset criticality, condition and safety factors

    OutputPriority and recommended response time

    03
  4. Qualified crew assigned and dispatch approved

    InputPrioritized work and crew availability

    OutputApproved assignment to a crew with the required qualifications

    Review required

    04
  5. Completion recorded and asset history updated

    InputField results captured offline or online

    OutputClosed work order, updated asset condition and GIS attributes

    05

SYSTEM DESIGN

The architecture behind the workflow.

A reference design that keeps business applications separate from operational control systems.

  1. Asset registry and GIS adapter
  2. Meter and telemetry read interface
  3. Work order and dispatch service
  4. Offline-first field app
  5. Operations and customer views
  6. Qualified crew assigned and dispatch approved
  7. Asset registry and GIS adapter to Meter and telemetry read interface
  8. Meter and telemetry read interface to Work order and dispatch service
  9. Work order and dispatch service to Offline-first field app
  10. Offline-first field app to Operations and customer views
  11. Work order and dispatch service to Qualified crew assigned and dispatch approved
  12. Qualified crew assigned and dispatch approved to Offline-first field app

Asset registry and GIS adapter -> Meter and telemetry read interface -> Work order and dispatch service -> Offline-first field app -> Operations and customer views

  • 01

    Asset registry and GIS adapter

    Reads assets, locations and network models from your GIS and asset management systems.

  • 02

    Meter and telemetry read interface

    Imports read-only meter and sensor data through historians or approved data feeds.

  • 03

    Work order and dispatch service

    Creates, prioritizes and assigns work with crew qualifications and scheduling rules.

  • 04

    Offline-first field app

    Lets crews view maps, records and checklists and capture results without connectivity, syncing safely later.

  • 05

    Operations and customer views

    Give supervisors work and asset dashboards and customers request and outage status.

Technology

Chosen for the systems above.

A working set we already use for workflow software. The exact tools are chosen after the interfaces, records, and review points are known.

  • ArcGIS / Esri APIs
  • Historian and meter data interfaces
  • Offline-first mobile frameworks
  • Work management integrations
  • Rugged device support
  • Interfaces

    React
    Next.js
    TypeScript
    Tailwind CSS
    React
    Next.js
    TypeScript
    Tailwind CSS
  • Services

    Node.js
    Python
    NestJS
    Express.js
    Node.js
    Python
    NestJS
    Express.js
  • Data

    PostgreSQL
    MongoDB
    MySQL
    Redis
    PostgreSQL
    MongoDB
    MySQL
    Redis
  • Delivery

    AWS
    Docker
    GitHub
    AWS
    Docker
    GitHub

DESIGN TRADE-OFFS

Decisions that change cost, reliability and scope.

Safety and critical infrastructure security drive most of these choices.

Control systems versus business operations

Field and maintenance apps should read operational data but not issue control commands; SCADA and control networks stay separate.

Agree the data boundary with your OT security and operations leads.

Edge collection versus periodic import

Remote sites with poor connectivity may need edge buffering; others can rely on historian or batch imports.

Survey site connectivity and data latency needs.

Predictive maintenance versus scheduled inspection

Prediction needs consistent condition and failure history across asset classes; schedules and condition thresholds remain the baseline.

Assess data coverage for each asset class before modeling.

Control systems versus business operations

Field and maintenance apps should read operational data but not issue control commands; SCADA and control networks stay separate.

Agree the data boundary with your OT security and operations leads.

Edge collection versus periodic import

Remote sites with poor connectivity may need edge buffering; others can rely on historian or batch imports.

Survey site connectivity and data latency needs.

Predictive maintenance versus scheduled inspection

Prediction needs consistent condition and failure history across asset classes; schedules and condition thresholds remain the baseline.

Assess data coverage for each asset class before modeling.

SECURITY & COMPLIANCE

Controls appropriate to critical infrastructure.

We design with your OT security team so business applications don't create new paths to control systems.

This software is not SCADA or control software and does not provide regulatory certification. Bulk electric system entities may be subject to NERC CIP requirements; scope must be confirmed with your compliance team.

  • OT network segmentation

    Operational data flows outward through approved, monitored interfaces; business apps never connect directly to control networks.

  • Change management for critical assets

    Changes to asset records, priorities and procedures follow approval workflows with full history.

  • Field identity and work authorization

    Crews sign in with strong authentication, and only qualified, authorized workers can accept certain work types.

  • Offline sync integrity and provenance

    Field data captured offline keeps device, user, time and location, and conflicts are resolved by rules, not overwrites.

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0NIST SP 800-82 (OT security guidance)NERC CIP (where applicable, reference)
NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0NIST SP 800-82 (OT security guidance)NERC CIP (where applicable, reference)

DELIVERY APPROACH

From real field constraints to a verifiable release.

We pilot with one asset class and crew before scaling across regions.

  1. 01

    Identify systems and safety constraints

    Inventory GIS, asset, CIS and OT systems and agree data boundaries.

    Signed system inventory and OT data boundary agreement.

  2. 02

    Map assets and field workflows

    Ride along with crews and map inspection and work order steps.

    Approved field workflow, checklists and asset data mapping.

  3. 03

    Pilot one asset-class workflow

    Deliver inspection-to-work-order for one asset class.

    Pilot running with one crew on real assets.

  4. 04

    Test offline recovery and exception routing

    Test long offline periods, sync conflicts and urgent escalations.

    Test results for offline sync, conflicts and escalation timing.

  5. 05

    Scale with operations sign-off

    Expand region by region with training and support.

    Rollout plan, training records and operations sign-off per region.

PROJECT PLANNING

What we need to define before development begins.

These questions establish the safe boundary and the first asset class.

  1. 01

    Which GIS, asset management, CIS and work management systems are in use?

  2. 02

    Which data may business applications read from operational systems?

  3. 03

    Which asset class and region should the pilot cover?

  4. 04

    How long are crews offline, and on what devices?

  5. 05

    Which outcome matters most: inspection backlog, repeat visits or customer updates?

GIS and asset system access

OT security approval

Pilot crew and devices

Compliance review for applicable standards

GIS and asset system access

OT security approval

Pilot crew and devices

Compliance review for applicable standards

Energy and utility software development FAQs.

Yes, typically through platform APIs such as ArcGIS services and your asset or work management system's interfaces. We map asset identifiers between systems so field results update the right records.

Yes. Crews can view maps, asset records and checklists and capture results without signal. Data syncs when connectivity returns, with conflict rules so updates aren't lost or overwritten.

In some asset classes, if you have consistent condition data and failure history. We assess data first; where it's limited, we start with condition thresholds and build the history needed for prediction.

Our applications stay on the business side of your network. Operational data is read through approved, monitored interfaces, and we never issue control commands. Designs are reviewed with your OT security team.

No. We build business, field and customer applications that use operational data, and leave control systems to specialized vendors and engineers.

You own the application and the operational records it stores. GIS, EAM, and control systems remain the sources you designate. We do not treat a field note as a command to equipment.

It can store a crew's assigned work and sync when the connection returns. Conflicts, such as two updates to the same asset, are shown to a person instead of overwritten.

One asset workflow: inspections, outage tickets, or work orders for a single region. Control-system changes and SCADA replacement are out of scope unless separately defined.

Field users get the records their job needs. The application does not open a path from a personal device into operational technology. That boundary is agreed with your security team before build.

Have a field, asset or service workflow to build?

Tell us your systems and the asset class that causes most work. We'll scope a safe pilot with one crew.

Tell us how the work runs today, which systems already hold the data, and what a useful first release would change. We use that to judge scope before anyone writes a proposal.

The form goes to a solutions architect at THE TISA. You get a direct reply on fit, approach, and what we would need from your team.

18+AI Agents
24+Workflow Automation
35+AI Integrations
12+SaaS Products
16+Generative AI
40+Mobile Apps
45+Web Platforms
25+Cloud Delivery
98%Client Retention

Share your scope

Tell us about the workflow or product. A solutions architect replies within one business day.

2 + 7 =